These research projects focus on the intersection of Holocaust denial, antisemitism, and the instrumentalization of history in contemporary discourse. As a specialist in Holocaust denial and distortion, this work examines how denialist rhetoric evolves and how its mechanisms can be applied to more recent forms of denialism, providing a deeper understanding of current issues.

One ongoing study explores the use of Holocaust analogies in public discourse following the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. It critically assesses the ideological contradictions among historians who, while denouncing the instrumentalization of the Holocaust, simultaneously engage in distortions themselves.

Another research project examines how certain figures of the radical left transitioned from anti-Zionism to Holocaust denial during the 1980s and 1990s. This period saw the emergence of networks where Holocaust denial was reframed as a form of political activism, often under the guise of anti-colonialism and opposition to Israel. These discourses, initially centered on the criticism of Zionism, progressively integrated classical antisemitic narratives, blurring the lines between political critique and Holocaust denial.

A third area of inquiry investigates the historical convergence of antisemitism and anti-Zionism across the far right and far left. This study explores how both political extremes have utilized similar tropes—such as portraying Jews as liars, manipulators, or global conspirators—to fuel their respective ideologies. Through the analysis of Holocaust denial, trivialization, and enduring antisemitic stereotypes, this research seeks to understand the adaptability of these narratives over time.

In addition to these academic projects, a complementary initiative focuses on the development of short-form videos to debunk Holocaust distortion, antisemitic rhetoric, and conspiracy theories proliferating on social media. These videos aim to provide accessible, evidence-based counter-narratives to combat misinformation in digital spaces. By reaching a wider audience, this initiative bridges the gap between scholarly research and public engagement in the fight against hate speech.